<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WI Court of Appeals on denial of a rental applicant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justalandlord.com/2010/01/01/wi-court-of-appeals-on-denial-of-a-rental-applicant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justalandlord.com/2010/01/01/wi-court-of-appeals-on-denial-of-a-rental-applicant/</link>
	<description>Tim Ballering&#039;s Survival Tips for Landlords in an Unjust World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Peters</title>
		<link>http://justalandlord.com/2010/01/01/wi-court-of-appeals-on-denial-of-a-rental-applicant/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justalandlord.com/?p=583#comment-84</guid>
		<description>What I find interesting is that when the complaint did not show up the first time, the case was merely rescheduled.  Yet when the defendant did not show up the second time, she was judged to be guilty.   Hardly seems fair, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find interesting is that when the complaint did not show up the first time, the case was merely rescheduled.  Yet when the defendant did not show up the second time, she was judged to be guilty.   Hardly seems fair, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
