Dec 23
“Going Green” is usually a positive phrase. Business that go “Green” are looked at as innovators and use this for a market advantage. It is hard to say anything bad about this type of greeness
However the way the city of Milwaukee is going grheck scares the heck out of me. .
As I drove the Southside neighborhoods finishing up our annual fall exterior surveys of our properties, I was shocked at the number of green boarded and abandoned homes and duplexes in that area. Even more than there were in spring
Continue reading »
Dec 22
Question: If there is a material falsification of information provided by a tenant on the rental application, what are your options? (Granted a good screening process should have caught it).
Once you accept a tenant you must allow them to move in, even if they materially falsified the app. This is covered under the ATCP 134:
ATCP 134.09(6) (6) FAILURE TO DELIVER POSSESSION. No landlord shall fail to deliver possession of the dwelling unit to the tenant at the time agreed upon in the rental agreement, except where the landlord is unable to deliver possession because of circumstances beyond the landlord’s control.
An interesting question would be if they lied about who they were, i.e. gave a false name, could you refuse to let anyone but the person named on the lease to move in?
Preventing this? Hard. If you ran a credit report, that should have show other names used. A pre-acceptance home visit may have exposed the inconsistencies and extra adult.
This one bit us in the butt a few years ago. We were evicting a woman because her two adult daughters had moved in with her and were performing prostitution in the basement of the building. We had an applicant for a different address who we accepted. One of my managers saw the woman we accepted in the waiting room and asked what she was doing her as she was the prostitute daughter of the tenant we were evicting from Walker street.
We refused to allow the woman to take the other unit and gave her back all of her money. She got an attorney and they won the argument in court. We were required to give her $500 in addition to her earnest money, which we had already given back.